• postimage

    04:10 PM Victor Looi (LLB, BBM(Finance), Singapore Management University)

    The Use of Similar Colour Schemes, Layouts, and Allegedly Deceptive Geographical References in Trade Marks

    In the recent decision of Morinaga Nyugyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Morinaga Milk Industry Co., Ltd.) v. Starbucks Corporation D/B/A Starbucks Coffee Company [2017] SGIPOS 18, the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore explored two intriguing issues concerning trade mark opposition proceedings: whether a trade mark proprietor can oppose the registration of a later competing mark because the latter shar...

  • postimage

    02:14 PM Elias Arun (LL.B. (Hons), National University of Singapore) and Joshua Kow (LL.B. (Hons), National University of Singapore)

    A Suspended State of Patent Invalidity: Sun Electric Pte Ltd v Sunseap Group Pte Ltd and others [2017] SGHC 232

    Can patent revocation proceedings be properly brought before the High Court at first instance, by way of a counterclaim in infringement proceedings before the court? This was the central question addressed by the learned George Wei J in the recent case of Sun Electric Pte Ltd v Sunseap Group Pte Ltd and others [2017] SGHC 232. ...

  • postimage

    10:47 PM Victor Looi (LLB, BBM(Finance), Singapore Management University)

    The Amendment of Patent Claims, Protection of Subsequent Medical Uses, and Validity of Swiss-Style Claims

    In the recent decision of Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2017] SGCA 45, the five-judge Court of Appeal (the “CA”) examined two issues in patent law which had hitherto received scant mention by the local courts, viz, whether subsequent medical uses of known substances were protected under the Patents Act (the “Act”), and whether Swiss-style claims (i.e., purpose-limited ...

  • postimage

    02:50 PM Loh Kai Loon (Counsel, Ashurst ADTLaw)

    Foreign bank mergers, universal succession and the Singapore Banking Act

    In Jacob Agam and another v BNP Paribas SA [2017] SGCA(I) 01, the Singapore Court of Appeal delivered its first judgment for an appeal from the Singapore International Commercial Court. The Court of Appeal held that Section 55B of the Banking Act, Chapter 19 of Singapore (the "Banking Act") is permissive, not mandatory. Section 55B provides a method for the voluntary transfer of the business of a ...

  • postimage

    04:30 PM Charleston Teo (LLB, Singapore Management University)

    Clarifying the forum non conveniens doctrine: Rappo, Tania v Accent Delight International Ltd and another and another appeal [2017] SGCA 27

    In Rappo, Tania v Accent Delight International Ltd and another and another appeal [2017] SGCA 27 ("Accent Delight"), the Court of Appeal (the "CA") clarified, inter alia, that in applying the test enunciated in Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460 ("Spiliada") for natural forum cases, the availability of the Singapore International Commercial Court (the "SICC") to hear the di...